Packers have absolutely dominated this series in GB for a long, long time. With all due respect, this is what so many cappers do on Monday morning. They see one team get beat and one team win and then think a team like the Lions will win.
Look at the boxscore from both games.
GB and Minnesota both averaged 5.0 yards per play. While GB only rushed for 3.3 ypr, they held the Vikings to 4.3 yards per rush, which is way below what they did last year. GB actually passed for 5.8 yards per pass compared to only 5.7 yards per pass for Minnesota. So, from that perspective, they played the Vikings even, which is a far different story from what the final score would indicate. What was the problem? Five turnovers to only two for the Vikings.
Arizona completely out gained Detroit, averaging 6.5 yards per play to only 4.9 for Detroit, out rushed Detroit 4.8 to 2.9 ypr, and out passed Detroit, 7.2 to 6.5. What was the difference in this game? Turnovers, 3-0 in favor of Detroit. Throw in a punt return for a touchdown and you have a Detroit win. Another very misleading score.
I haven't made my final decision for this game but all I am saying is dig a little deeper and you may see a completely different story. Yes, the Packer injuries at receiver have to be accounted for but so does the fact they have completely dominated Detroit at home.